Defense Data Grand Prix II

Defense Data Grand Prix II

Solving Grand Problems to Meet a Grand Vision

The Defense Data Grand Prix II has commenced in Spring 2024 with a new data sponsor and exciting new problems!

About

The Department of Defense (DoD) Data Strategy was published in 2020 envisioning the DoD as a data-centric organization that supports digital modernization and uses data at the speed and scale for operational advantage and increased efficiency. The strategy emphasized the importance of data access, usability, standards, talent, and culture.  As a data-intensive function, defense acquisition is a key area of focus toward achieving the DoD’s strategic vision.

This Defense Data Grand Prix challenge aims to:

• Explore the possibilities for improving data access;
• Increase awareness of Defense Acquisition System challenges, decisions, and processes;
• Encourage innovation to generate unanticipated findings to improve National Security.

The DoD is seeking faculty-led student teams to tackle compelling, real-world problems with data science. These challenges offer ready-made practicums that can be integrated with graduate courses and research seminars.

Operational Sponsor

The Navy’s Multi-Mission Tactical Unmanned Systems (UAS) program office (PMA-266) provides critical capabilities to the fleet incorporating state of the art technology and UAS expertise via rapid development, integration, deployment, and sustainment – “Cradle to Grave” – for the Navy’s rotary wing MQ-8C “Fire Scout” and USMC’s fixed wing MQ-9A “Reaper” MUX/MALE Uncrewed Air Systems.

Problem Statements

Operational Problem: The USAF has operated the MQ-9 for several years and has developed a large legacy data set related to sustainment. These data are predominantly related to Air Force-specific operating models and sustainment infrastructure, rather than forward-deployed operations. The USMC is fielding MQ-9s to support forward deployed contested and uncontested expeditionary operations under Force Design 2030. These operations will be under different and challenging conditions and leverage differently designed sustainment infrastructures and capabilities. PMA-266 seeks refined and optimized models for maintaining, sustaining, and supplying these aircraft for 24/7 continuous operations in these forward contested and uncontested regions.

Operational Problem: The USMC has developed a concept called Force Design 2030 for projecting force in future conflicts. This concept includes the use of MAGTFs and sustainment infrastructure for rapidly responsive expeditionary operations that can extend into highly contested operational regions for extended periods of time. PMA-266 seeks refined models for logistics sustainment, supportability priorities, supply chain management, and delivery strategies in contested environments to support and maintain 24/7 continuous operations. These data-driven recommendations can also inform future MUX/MALE requirements and Naval Aviation Enterprise uncrewed acquisition priorities, including Future Vertical Lift. To assess future vertical lift needs, the USMC desires to use existing aviation platforms as a surrogate for this analysis.

Operational Problem: PMA-266 must routinely complete operational and development test activities to verify and validate the operational effectiveness and suitability of unmanned systems in its portfolio. Test planning, execution, and data reduction/analysis can be cumbersome, demanding of specialized skills, resource-intensive, time consuming, and predominantly manual. PMA-266 seeks methods to reduce planning, preparation, execution, and analysis time and accuracy of these test activities and data and improve total test team throughput to speed delivery of capabilities to the fleet warfighter. There is potential to leverage AI/ML-enabled and automated test and evaluation methods, optimized test designs of experiments, and near-real time big data analytics and recommendations to assist human test conductors and lead test engineers to significantly reduce total time for continuous test, evaluation and delivery of new capabilities. In addition, new AI/ML-enabled non-deterministic mission systems add a level of test complexity not experienced with traditional, deterministic systems. The concepts developed for improving all aspects of the testing process should also take into account the unique test requirements and methodologies that will be required for AI/ML-enabled mission systems.

Operational Problem: The DoD funds a great variety of R&D projects that have generated a corpus of findings and recommendations that could improve defense acquisition. These include SBIR/STTRs, NISE initiatives, and other government data sets. PMA-266 seeks AI/ML-enabled automated and continuous methods to synthesize “big” data from these various segregated and geographically disparate enterprise activities to recognize and recommend collections of combined disruptive technologies and opportunities that can solve human-provided warfighting capability goals given input assumptions, limitations, and constraints, in order to improve cooperation across services, leverage current or past similar work, minimize duplication of effort, and reduce technology development costs.

Awards

Awards will be made to the top teams through their universities.

   $40K First Place

   $30K Second Place

   $20K Third Place

   $10K Fourth Place

Eligibility

Faculty-led teams at any accredited universities in the United States are eligible to register for the Defense Data Grand Prix.

Faculty are encouraged to include students on their teams to gain hands-on experience solving real-world problems facing the DoD.

All team members must be from the same academic institution.

All members of participating teams must be U.S. citizens.

SERC/AIRC collaborator universities are encouraged to participate, including Auburn, Carnegie Mellon, Georgetown, Georgia Tech, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Old Dominion, Penn State, Purdue, Stevens Institute of Technology (lead), Texas A&M, University of Alabama in Huntsville, University of Massachusetts Amherst, University of Maryland, University of Southern California (USC), University of Virginia, and Virginia Tech. Collaborating military universities include the Air Force Institute of Technology and the Naval Postgraduate School.

Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) and Minority Institutions (MIs) are also encouraged to participate in this challenge. 

AIRC-DAU Quarterly Research Forum: The Future of Managing Mega Projects

Events

AIRC-DAU Quarterly Research Forum: The Future of Managing Mega Projects

Friday, December 8, 2023

12:00 PM -1:30 PM ET

Researchers from the Acquisition Innovation Research Center are exploring how data visualization, artificial intelligence, and machine learning can be combined with human knowledge transfer across teams to aid in the management of DoD’s largest programs (mega projects). Major defense acquisition programs and multiple, interoperating system-of-systems efforts (such as Joint All-Domain Command and Control) are mega projects. Mega projects are often mega-systems that operate with dimensions of behavioral complexity, pluralistic decision-making, criticality, and volatility of the external environment. Beyond just involving large financial resources, their complexity leads to greater uncertainty and higher risks.

In this Quarterly Research Forum with Defense Acquisition University, the research team will present the current state-of-practice in commercial industry and non-DoD governmental use of data visualization, artificial intelligence, and machine learning to manage mega projects.

Participants will be able to engage in a question-and-answer session following these presentations. Members of the defense acquisition workforce will receive a certificate of participation after completing the end-of-session activity to claim 1.5 continuous learning points (CLPs).

Past Events of the AIRC-DAU Quarterly Research Forum

Innovation Capstone

Innovation Capstone

Request For Proposal (RFP) and Project Proposal Instructions for the DCTC Innovation Capstone Cadre

The Acquisition Innovation Research Center (AIRC) is requesting proposals for “Innovation Capstones” from all accredited universities in the U.S. as part of the inaugural DCTC Innovation Capstone Cadre.

Innovation Capstones

Innovation Capstones are project-based learning environments for university undergraduate and graduate students. They are similar to senior design and “capstone” projects conducted at most universities, however, Innovation Capstones will engage students across all majors – business, science, policy, engineering, law, and beyond, to form full multidisciplinary project teams. These Innovation Capstone teams will work on challenging problems/projects of interest from a broad set of stakeholders in the Department of Defense (DOD). Teams will use “whole of business” and “whole of government” approaches to develop their solutions. In some cases, student teams and their research topics may be entirely “business” or “policy” in nature. The intent of Innovation Capstones is to broaden the scope of traditional technical developments in areas important to national defense, by augmenting teams with students and faculty who can address team organization, scheduling, financing, and overall business and management skills necessary to introduce new products and capabilities into DOD systems.

Eligibility — Universities and Students

AIRC’s Innovation Capstones will only be awarded to universities where participating faculty and students are “U.S. Persons”.

Proposals may be accepted, and Innovation Capstone subcontracts awarded to all accredited universities in the U.S.

Undergraduate and graduate students may participate.

Types of Project Teams and Statements of Work

There are at least three pathways for Innovation Capstone projects that combine the skills of students from all majors – working in Business and Management disciplines as well as in traditional technical and engineering areas. Each team should have 2 or more distinct academic disciplines represented.

As the DCTC Innovation Capstone Cadre is a new concept, other capstone team and faculty arrangements may be proposed.  

Option 1 — Integrated Team

Each Innovation Capstone team integrates both technical and management students and their activities into a single team during the project period. Each project team will develop their products and present a complete business plan, documenting the necessary government actions to transition work into a supported DOD program. A detailed Statement of Work will be required, including descriptions of deliverables. A single AIRC subcontract will be awarded for the team, with a total subcontract ceiling of $10K.

Option 2 — Separate Tech and Business Teams

Each Innovation Capstone project will be separated into two efforts– a technical team and a business team. Each team will have separate Statements of Work with specific deliverables. Both the tech and the business teams must be “full” teams; multidisciplinary teamwork is a capstone objective. Each technical and management student team will receive a separate AIRC subcontract, with a total subcontract ceiling of $10K per team.

Option 3 — Matrixed Management Team

Multiple Innovation Capstone teams will be established to develop prototype solutions, generally technical in nature, that are necessary to meet the objectives of each of the project topics. In addition, a single group of management students will form a separate “management team” that will be responsible for overall coordination of the other project teams. Each technical team will have at least one management student matrixed to that team. Each technical team and the single management team will receive separate AIRC contracts. The matrixed management team will be responsible for business and other management details of all the technical teams; these products will be specified as additional deliverables in the management team’s Statement of Work. Each technical team and the matrixed management team will receive a separate AIRC subcontract with a subcontract ceiling of $10K per team.

Government Capstone Partners

As early as possible, universities should identify appropriate DOD partners from Service Components, laboratories, development centers, acquisition organizations, etc. for each capstone team. DOD partners can offer challenging problems and can provide Subject Matter Experts (SME) for capstone teams on a collaborative basis. These SMEs assist student teams throughout the Academic Year, and provide subject mentoring, coaching, and critiques during team meetings and project reviews.

Proposal Coordination

AIRC requires a proposal from universities for each student team, with distinct deliverables, as described in “Types of Project Teams” detailed above. There are no restrictions on the number of topics and awards that can be made to a single university. Student teams may vary in size and composition according to the scope and complexity of the projects. Team composition must reflect balance in students’ workload, required knowledge, skills, and responsibilities. Collaborative and/or competitive efforts between different universities, on project topics are encouraged.

Period of Performance and Schedules

Innovation Capstones will generally be two semester efforts. Innovation Capstones start in the Fall Semester; however, some may start in Spring Semester, or during Summer sessions. AIRC’s funds awarded to the 2023 Innovation Capstone Cadre will expire on July 30, 2024.

Contracts, Funding Ceilings, Restrictions

Each AIRC Innovation Capstone subcontract will be issued by Stevens Institute of Technology (SIT) as a Firm Fixed Price award to a university, for a specific project and a single student team. A Statement of Work will describe high level project objectives and team deliverables. The funding for each project team will have a ceiling of $10K. Direct labor charges will be allowed subject to university policy.

Invoices

University business offices may invoice SIT for Innovation Capstone projects at the conclusion of their two semesters’ work, or when the contract deliverables are satisfied, as applicable.

Proposal Preparation and Submission

The proposal includes a Project Description; this section is brief and should not exceed two (2) pages in length. Other Project information sheets and budget sections do not count against this limit. The proposal template gives guidance on other details such as faculty involvement, multidisciplinary capstone approaches, educational techniques, laboratory, facility, and university resources, and past performances.

Universities are requested to submit project proposals to AIRC as early as possible. As most proposals are submitted before the start of the Academic Year, student teams do not have to be designated in the proposal or identified before Contract Awards.  Proposals should be submitted using the below proposal template. Proposals should be submitted using the proposal submission link on the AIRC proposal template. Documents and attachments must be submitted in MS Office applications or PDF formats using the template below.

Department of the Air Force and Army Digital Materiel Management (DMM) Industry Association Consortium (IAC)

Events

Department of the Air Force and Army Digital Materiel Management (DMM) Industry Association Consortium (IAC) Kickoff

November 2-3, 2023

Day 1: 8:30 AM - 5:00 PM ET
Day 2: 8:30 AM - 2:00 PM ET

Keynotes & Executive Perspectives

Kristen Baldwin_sq_1
Ms. Kristen J. Baldwin
(SES) Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Science, Technology, and Engineering, Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics
Jennifer-Swanson-Army (1)
Ms. Jennifer Swanson
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for Data, Engineering & Software (DASA(DES)), ASA(ALT)
Brigadier-square-01
Brig. Gen. Luke Cropsey
Department of the Air Force Integrating Program Executive Officer for Command, Control, Communications and Battle Management, Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics
Steven-square-01
Mr. Steven D. Wert
(SES) Program Executive Officer Digital, Air Force Life Cycle Management Center, Hanscom Air Force Base
Robert Fookes
Mr. Robert B. Fookes
(SES) Director of Engineering and Technical Management, and Chief Engineer, Air Force Materiel Command
Krzysko-official-2
Mr. Mark E. Krzysko
Principal Deputy Director, Enterprise Information, OUSD(A&S)
Seraphin-thumbnail
Dr. Arun Seraphin
Director, NDIA/ETI
Eileen Bjorkman edited
Dr. Eileen A. Bjorkman
(SES) Executive Director, Air Force Test Center, Edwards Air Force Base
SAF_AQCC_-_Kanna Annamalai-Brown_-_Chief_The IP Cadre - Copy_edited
Ms. Angayurkanni Annamalai-Brown
Chief of the Air Force Intellectual Property Cadre
Richard Gray
Mr. Richard M. Gray
Director of the Intellectual Property Cadre, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment
Margaret Boatner-sq-01
Ms. Margaret E. Boatner
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for Strategy and Acquisition Reform, Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology)
Kaplan_Bruce_square-crop_0 copy
Mr. Bruce Kaplan
Fellow Emeritus, Logistics Strategy and Integration, LMI
Kris Acosta
Ms. Kris Acosta
Director of System of Systems Engineering, Space Systems Command
1517358626048
Col. Erik Quigley
United States Air Force
Chris Benson-sq-01
Dr. Chris Benson
Chief Technology Officer, Istari, Inc.
Matt Seaman
Mr. Matt Seaman
Director, Data Solutions and External Engagement, Lockheed Martin
Mark McMullan
Mr. Mark McMullan
Vice President, Digital Sustainment Solutions, EXPANSIA
Rob Nolen
Mr. Rob Nolen
Chief Technologist, DoD, Amazon Web Services
Matthew-Rose_sq_2-300x300
Mr. Matthew Rose
AIRC Innovation Panel
Jeff D'Amelia_edited
Mr. Jeffrey D’Amelia
Chief Engineer, Nuclear Enterprise Division, Air & Space Forces Center, MITRE
Dan Heller
Mr. Daniel J. Heller
Vice President, Corporate Engineering, Lockheed Martin
Dr. Olivia Pinon Fischer
Dr. Olivia Pinon Fischer
Principal Research Engineer, School of Aerospace Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology
Alberto Ferrari
Dr. Alberto Ferrari
Executive Director, Technology & Global Engineering, RTX
Vicky O'Sullivan
Ms. Vicky O’Sullivan
Digital Engineering & Transformation Project Lead, MITRE
Laura Szypulski
Ms. Laura Szypulski
Director & Chief Architect, Digital Transformation, Northrop Grumman
Dean Bucher
Dr. Dean Bucher
Principal Director, Digital Engineering Integration, The Aerospace Corporation
stephanie-halcrow
Ms. Stephanie Halcrow
AIRC Fellow
Alexis Lasselle Ross
Dr. Alexis Lasselle Ross
Senior Fellow, NDIA
David Pearson
Mr. David Pearson
Director, Engineering and Technology Center, DAU
O5TtIIwcb4q9gv19YBtC26yd52IayPYqAwLoEu8Z
Dr. Nicole Hutchison
Senior Research Scientist, Systems Engineering Research Center
person-icon-3
Mr. Norm Metzger
MTSI
person-icon-3
Ms. Kelly Kyes
Policy and Strategy Lead, Boeing

About the Workshop

The Department of the Air Force, Army, broader DoD and the defense industry have shared roles in the development and sustainment of major defense systems. The engineering and program management artifacts that define these roles have been individually transitioning to digital forms for 30+ years, while the business practices and contract boundaries have remained mostly unchanged.

The value of digital transformation over the system life cycle is gained from seamless and efficient connectivity of data and models, full lifecycle management and access to these data & models (known as authoritative sources of truth), and an overarching imperative to radically accelerate our fielding, sustainment, and modernization of warfighter capabilities.

The promise of Digital Materiel Management (DMM) will be achieved when “models replace documents, structured data replaces disparate information, and digital collaboration breaks down decision stovepipes.” (AFMC – DMM: An Accelerated Future State). The technology has been rapidly evolving, but the acquisition system has been slower to adapt. There are a number of concerns that are delaying uptake of the full DMM promise in materiel program offices. These concerns have been organized into the following focus areas:

  1. Data Standards/Ontologies/Style Guides to Enable DMM
  2. Policy and Enforcement for DMM
  3. Integration of Acquisition Functions
  4. DMM/DE Infrastructure and Environment
  5. Workforce Development and Training for DMM (Impacting Culture)

Resources

Authored by the Air Force Materiel Command

Authored by the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics and the Assistant Secretary for Space Acquisition and Integration

Authored by the Department of the Air Force Digital Transformation Office

Venue and Lodging

The Department of the Air Force and Army Digital Materiel Management (DMM) Industry Association Consortium (IAC) Kickoff will take place at the Ritz-Carlton, 1250 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202. This workshop is in-person only with limited seating.

Points of Contact

Primary Contact

Department of the Air Force

Department of the Army

NDIA/ETI

Assessing Contractor Labor Law Violations

Events

Assessing Contractor Labor Law Violations

September 12, 2023 & December 12, 2023

11:00 AM & 1:00 PM ET

***This event page is archival.***

The Department of Labor has thousands of records on violations by federal contractors. Do you know how to access and assess those records when evaluating contractors’ present responsibility? To learn how, join this free training, called for by Congress and coordinated by AIRC and the Defense Acquisition University (DAU). This is an important learning opportunity for contracting personnel, debarment officials and counsel.

There will be two distinct sessions:

Tuesday, September 12, 11:00 AM Eastern

Thursday, December 12, 1:00 PM Eastern

Attendees can earn two Continuous Learning Points (CLP) for each session.

Sessions

Session 1: Tuesday, September 12, 11:00 AM Eastern

AIRC Fellows David Drabkin and Christopher Yukins will discuss their AIRC research report, “Congressionally Mandated Study on Contractor Debarments for Violations of U.S. Labor Laws.”

Session 2: Tuesday, December 12, 1:00 PM Eastern

A roundtable including senior government officials and debarment experts will discuss accessing and considering labor law violations.

For reference, view a letter report addressed to Congress.

Model-Based TEMP Strategy & Integrated Decision Support Key Workshop

Events

Model-Based TEMP Strategy & Integrated Decision Support Key Workshop

August 2-3, 2023

USC Information Sciences Institute | Hybrid

The United States (US) Department of Defense (DoD) and its supporting industry, research, and academia partners have proposed using Digital Engineering (DE) methods and tools to update traditional systems engineering (SE) and test and evaluation (T&E) practices to improve acquisition outcomes and accelerate traditional processes.

One critical element of the T&E process is the development of the Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP), in which the program office, systems engineers, and testers come together to document an adequate test and evaluation strategy that spans major program milestones. DE provides opportunities to enhance the TEMP by directly incorporating data and models into the process of documenting the test strategy and program.

A new core element of the TEMP is the Integrated Decision Support Key (IDSK) and Evaluation Matrix family of related tables (e.g., requirements, evaluation measures and metrics, key program decisions, test events, etc.). The IDSK derives acquisition decisions from the developmental and operational test-based evaluations; the Evaluation Matrix links high level system performance metrics to their supporting test data.

This workshop will explore Digital Engineering, TEMPs, IDSKs to identify best practices, new methods and tools, and build consensus on where digital transformation will have the largest impact on T&E processes and documentation.

Workshop Objectives

Gather the T&E community from across the DoD, industry, and academia to discuss current state of capabilities, research gaps, and synergies, and develop a common vision for digitally transforming T&E practices.

Presentations will include demonstrations of tools and practices. Topics will include:

IDSK examples for T&E Across the Acquisition Life-cycle

Approaches to Model-Based IDSK

Best Practices in Digital Transformation

Linkages between legacy system performance, modeling, performance assessment, and decision-support data/information

IDSK application across the Acquisition Lifecyle and integration of Digital Twins

Speakers

Randy Saunders-sq-1
Dr. Randy Saunders
Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
Biography

Dr. Saunders is a Software and Systems Analysis who has held positions of increasing responsibility with 40+ years of experience. Roles and responsibility include: Principle analyst for Director, Operational Test and Evaluation program to digitally transform operational test strategies through the development of a Model-Based Test and Evaluation Master Plan concept. Project technical lead for the Air Force A9 Bayesian Enterprise Analysis Model (BEAM), a new statistical modeling paradigm to support enterprise scale analysis. Analysis lead on the OSD technical team for the Integrated Defense Analysis Capability (IDAC) development effort. Cyber security analyst for developmental and operation test organizations, focusing analysis on policy and process improvements. Research analyst for information technology efficiencies improvement across the intelligence community.

Dr. Laura Freeman
Dr. Laura Freeman
Virginia Tech National Security Institute
Biography

Dr. Freeman is a Research Professor of Statistics and dual hatted as the Deputy Director of the Virginia Tech National Security Institute and Assistant Dean for Research for the College of Science. Her research leverages experimental methods for conducting research that brings together cyber-physical systems, data science, artificial intelligence (AI), and machine learning to address critical challenges in national security.

Suzanne Beers-sq-1
Dr. Suzanne Beers
MITRE
Biography

Dr. Beers is MITRE’s Defense Systems Engineering Department Manager, leading personnel and portfolio management of six OSD-level test and evaluation (T&E), systems engineering and strategic analysis projects. In addition to her Department Manager responsibilities, Dr. Beers is the Technical Lead for OSD/DTE&A’s Integrated Decision Support Key initiative. This work – which she will be briefing during the workshop – includes evolving the IDSK concept from separate developmental and operational evaluation frameworks and applying it to both acquisition programs of record and full-spectrum (S&T to sustainment – especially to prototyping and experimentation) decision-support informed by operational and technical capability evaluation.
Dr. Beers joined MITRE in Colorado Springs after retiring from the USAF in October 2008. Her final assignment was as the Commander, Air Force Operational Test and Evaluation Center’s Detachment 4 at Peterson AFB leading the OT&E of new space, missile, and missile defense systems.
Dr. Beers holds a plethora of degrees (five) from a wide variety of institutions of higher learning…giving her plenty of cheering flexibility during college football season…including a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from The Ohio State University and a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology. Dr. Beers caught the triathlon bug, spending the last decade swimming, biking, running or talking triathlon with fellow addicts. She has since traded-in the triathlon hobby for astrophotography.

Caitlin Szymendera-sq-1
Ms. Caitlin Szymendera
NAVAIR
Biography

Ms. Caitlin Szymendera is the current Director for RDT&E Data and Technology for NAVAIR’s Engineering & Cyber Warfare Group. She also serves as the Test & Evaluation Tools Lead for the Department of the Navy’s (DON) Test & Evaluation Executive, working to modernize and standardize the digital landscape across the DON Test & Evaluation community. Ms. Szymendera spent the first half of her career as a Mission Systems Flight Test Engineer for the Presidential and CH-53K Helicopter Programs before transitioning to enterprise process improvement and digital tools program management.

Hans Mair-sq-1
Mr. Hans Mair
Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
Biography

Mr. Mair is a national security analyst and systems engineer analyzing complex adaptive system performance in support of consequential national security decisions.

Jason Bigger-sq-1
Mr. Jason Bigger
U.S. Army
Biography

Mr. Bigger is a Test Subject Matter Expert within the Army’s Future Long Range Assault Aircraft Program Management Office (PMO) under PEO Aviation. He has been a test engineer in PEO Aviation for over 20 years and has a BSE from Univ. of Alabama Huntsville (UAH).

George Michael Winter-sq-1
Mr. George Michael Winter
U.S. Army
Biography

Mr. Winter is a model-based systems engineer within the Army’s Future Long Range Assault Aircraft Program Management Office (PMO) under PEO Aviation. He has a MS in Systems Engineering from Kennesaw State University, a MS in Mechanical Engineering from Purdue University, and a BS in Mechanical Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology.

Space Force_Headshot
Maj Caleb “CJ” Werner and Mr. Ken Sexe
U.S. Space Force
Biography

The Digital Transformation and Command Tests Authority out of Space Systems Command have partnered to revolutionize the way Test & Evaluation is executed across space. Being in Space System Integration Office, both teams collaborate to bring new techniques and change the way Acquisitions is done in the Space Force. Although a young team, this group has created the Model Based T&E Reference Model (MBTERM) which has become a flagship of Enterprise Digital Transformation and Engineering not only across the Space Force but has garnered support from stakeholders all across the DoD and IC. Being in a new service and new organization, the MBTERM team is able to design with multi-domain warfare in mind and is dedicated to support not only the attack and defend mission in space, but allow the Space Enterprise T&E function to support mission partners.

Trisha Radocaj-sq-1
Ms. Trisha Radocaj
Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
Biography

Ms. Radocaj is a Systems Engineer in Force Projection Section, Model-Based & Digital Mission Engineering. She has been supporting Test & Evaluation Planning with model-base strategies that relate mission planning to system implementation and operational, developmental and contractor test. Her background includes analysis of launch vehicle and satellite propulsion systems supporting Air Force projects, as well as unmanned control systems and communication systems supporting the Navy.

James Ferry-sq-1
Dr. James Ferry
Metron, Inc.
Biography

Dr. Ferry is a Senior Research Scientist at Metron, Inc. He has an SB in Mathematics from MIT and a PhD in Applied Mathematics from Brown University. He has been the Principal Investigator for a variety of projects for DARPA, ONR, and the intelligence community. His areas of expertise include Bayesian reasoning, network science, data fusion, and fluid dynamics.

Kelli Esser-sq-1
Dr. Kelli Esser
Virginia Tech National Security Institute
Biography

Dr. Esser is the Associate Director for the Intelligent Systems Division of the Virginia Tech National Security Institute. She is a recognized leader and change agent with over eighteen years of experience working with national and homeland security agencies to improve the planning, management, and coordination of research development and innovation investments across public and private partners. Dr. Esser’s research has contributed to major policy and implementation changes across government in the areas of test and evaluation, capabilities-based planning, and operational assessments in support of technology development, transition, and deployment.

Alexander_Headshot
Mr. Matthew Alexander
MITRE
Biography

Mr. Alexander is a Senior Systems Engineer with MITRE supporting the Space Training and Readiness Command and the Space Systems Command. He has used a range of methods, techniques, and tools to digitally execute multiple systems engineering and mission engineering methods and processes for the Space Force. He has also performed Digital Engineering to positively impact the U.S. Army, the U.S. Air Force, the U.S. Navy, the U.S. Space Force, and a Joint Program Office of a highly visible program. He has earned recognition from government, MITRE, and contractor top leadership. Non-DoD systems engineering included work for the FAA, DHS, IRS, CMS, and VA. Matt earned a Bachelors of Science and then a Masters of Science in Systems Engineering from the John Hopkins University. He took a Worcester Polytechnic Institute MBSE course taught by MBSE industry thought leader Sanford Friedenthal and is taking an MIT Professional Education course on the New Space Economy in October 2023.

Mulligan_Headshot
Mr. David Mulligan
MITRE
Biography

Mr. Mulligan is the Project Lead for the Space Training and Readiness Command (STARCOM) within the Space Enterprise Architecting Department of MITRE’s Air and Space Force Center where he’s responsible for directing the work for MITRE’s support to the Test & Evaluation Enterprise, as well as the STARCOM & Space Systems Center National Space Test & Training Complex (NSTTC) Integrated Program Office. Since joining MITRE in 2010, Dave has been involved in a range of activities, spanning a variety of roles leading and supporting requirements development, cyber, test and evaluation and program assessments of space capabilities. His experiences span direct support to a program office to major command to OSD Research & Engineering Developmental Test, Evaluation & Assessments. Dave earned a B.S. in Computer Science from Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, a MBA from Webster University, a M.S. in Systems Engineering from the Air Force Institute of Technology. Dave is also a 27-year US Air Force veteran with linguist, software development, network management, tactical communications, radar evaluation, cyber and space protection experiences.

Craig Arndt-sq-1
Dr. Craig Arndt
George Tech Research Institute
Biography

Dr. Arndt has extensive experience as a senior executive and technology leader in research, education, engineering and defense, homeland security and intelligence technologies, with extensive experience as an innovative leader in industry, academia, and government. He is often called upon as an industry expert to chair major program reviews; lead new programs, bid and proposal efforts, in the areas of C4ISR and sensor systems, Intellectual Properties and Data Rights, Human Factors, and Systems Engineering.
Dr. Arndt currently serves as a principal research engineer on the research faculty of the George Tech Research Institute (GTRI) in the System Engineering Research division of the Electronic Systems Lab. Dr. Arndt is a licensed Professional Engineer (PE), and has over 40 years of professional engineering experience though the defense and government engineering community.
Dr. Arndt holds engineering degrees in electrical engineering, systems engineering and human factors engineering and a Masters of Arts in strategic studies from the US Naval War college. He served as Professor and Chair of the engineering department at the Defense Acquisition University, and as technical director of the Homeland security FFRDC at the MITRE Corporation.
In industry, Dr. Arndt has served as a manager at all levels of engineering management including director of systems engineering, CTO and Vic President of Engineering, and has led business units, companies, and engineering organizations of all sizes located both in the United States and internationally.
As an active member of the academic and professional community, he has served as a technical expert for the Army and Defense Science Boards, the CNO’s Strategic Studies Group (SSG), the National Science Foundation, the International Standards Organization (ISO), the IEEE, and other public and private technical organizations, and for several major universities.
Dr. Arndt served as an engineering officer in the US Navy and retired from the Navy in 2013. He is married to Dorothy Becker and has two children and three grandchildren.

Brentson J. Bell Jr.-sq-1
Mr. Brentson J. Bell Jr.
U.S. Army Cyber Resiliency and Training
Biography

Mr. Bell currently serves as a Deputy Product Manager for Cyber Resiliency and Training (PdM CRT) for the Program Executive Office for Simulation Training and Instrumentation (PEO STRI). Mr. Bell is responsible for all aspects of acquisition for a Major Defense Acquisition Program, the Persistent Cyber Training Environment (PCTE), enabling over 9,000 Cyber Mission Force operators to meet and exceed the Department of Defense Cyber Mission Readiness strategy.

Mr. Bell was previously the Deputy Product Director for Aviation Logistics for the Program Executive Officer of Enterprise Information Systems (PEO EIS). Mr. Bell established the product management office overseeing a 170-person operation for a Major Acquisition Information System program. He directed the planning and execution of a $750 million program which supported the development, testing, and fielding of the total Army Aviation Logistics portfolio within the Army enterprise capability modernizing logistics oversight of over 6,000 Army aircraft.

Mr. Bell also supported the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Developmental Test & Evaluation (DASD(DT&E)) Director as a Staff Specialist. He was responsible for providing oversight to several Major Acquisition Programs, reviewing their Integration, Test and Evaluation Strategies, Test and Evaluation Master Plans, System Engineering Plans, and evaluation reports providing program assessment recommendations to OSD leadership.

William Corey Bogler-sq-1
Mr. William Corey Bogler
U.S. Army Cyber Resiliency and Training
Biography

Mr. Bogler serves as the Senior Test & Integration Officer on the PCTE program. After graduating from East Stroudsburg University with a BS in Computer Science, Mr. Bogler started his career developing software for the Paladin self-propelled howitzer before transitioning to PEO STRI, where he led efforts to implement Modular Open Systems Approaches for the MILES live training product line.

In his time as Product Manager – Cyber Resiliency and Training, he has led both the Operations and Test teams and is a member of the CRT Leadership team.

John “JD” Donaldson-sq-1
Mr. John “JD” Donaldson
U.S. Army Cyber Resiliency and Training
Biography

After Mr. Donaldson earned his BS in Computer Science and a commission in the US Army, he served a rewarding 24-year career as a Signal Officer and paratrooper, during which he learned that leadership is service, and gained a lifelong passion for travel and adventure. Since hanging up his jump boots, John has worked in cybersecurity, while enjoying everything that life with Orlando as your homebase has to offer. As part of the innovative Persistent Cyber Training Environment test team, he has broken new ground in cybersecurity testing of Defense Department acquisition programs, helping to earn the team special designation as “Pathfinders” by the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology).

Gilbert Duverglas-sq-1
Mr. Gilbert Duverglas
U.S. Army Cyber Resiliency and Training
Biography

Mr. Duverglas is the Operational Test Lead for the Persistent Cyber Training Environment (PCTE). With nearly four years of dedicated experience with PCTE, Gilbert Duverglas has played a pivotal role in ensuring the program’s success by aiding in the development of the DevSecOps processes.

O'Neill_Headshot
Mr. Davin O’Neill
MITRE
Biography

Mr. O’Neill, with the MITRE Corporation, is a highly experienced technical leader with 20+ years of diverse experience in integrated architecture development, MBSE, software engineering, and digital engineering. With a BS in Physics and MS in Materials Engineering, he has made significant contributions to various domains, including ballistic missile defense and C4ISR systems. Currently supporting Army Test and Evaluation Command’s digital transformation, Davin develops model-based enterprise architectures, incorporating intelligent dashboards and simulation tools.

Jonathan Brown-sq-1
Mr. Jonathan Brown
Agile Data Decisions, Inc
Biography

Mr. Brown has led business development efforts focusing on the Department of Defense for over 15 years for software and robotics companies. He has led teams that have won multiple Phase I, II, and III SBIR and STTR contracts with the Air Force, Army, Navy, Marine Corps, and DARPA. In addition, he has secured multiple contracts from SOCOM and from DoD prime contractors. Mr. Brown previously worked for AnthroTronix, Inc, Silver Spring, MD; RE2 Robotics, Pittsburgh, PA; and Think-A-Move, Ltd, Beachwood, OH. Mr. Brown received his M.B.A. from the University of Chicago Booth School of Business and his B.A. from Connecticut College.

Location

USC Information Sciences Institute
4676 Admiralty Way, Marina Del Rey, CA 90292

Directions

  FROM

Los Angeles International Airport
1 World Way, Los Angeles, CA 90045

Icon-Line

Get on CA-1 N/S Sepulveda Blvd
5 min (1.0 mi) CA-1 N turns slightly right and becomes CA-1 N/Lincoln Blvd

Follow CA-1 N/Lincoln Blvd to Fiji Way
9 min (3.7 mi)

Drive to Admiralty Way in Marina del Rey
2 min (0.4 mi)

  TO

USC Information Sciences Institute
4676 Admiralty Way #1001, Marina Del Rey, CA 90292

Hotels

13534 Bali Way, Marina Del Rey, CA 90292
(310) 301-1000

4200 Admiralty Way, Marina Del Rey, CA 90292
310-301-2000

13480 Maxella Ave, Marina Del Rey, CA 90292
310-822-8555

4630 Via Marina, Marina Del Rey, CA 90292
310-439-2908

6161 West Centinela Avenue, Culver City, CA 90230
310-6491776

Point of Contact

G.Kerr_sq

Technical

Senior Research Associate, Systems and Digital Engineering, Virginia Tech National Security Institute
Tara Kelly

Registration

Research Project Manager, Systems Engineering Research Center (SERC), AIRC

AIRC-DAU Quarterly Research Forum: Digital Engineering

Events

AIRC-DAU Quarterly Research Forum: Digital Engineering

Friday, June 23, 2023

12:00 PM - 1:30 PM

The fourth Acquisition Innovation Research Center-DAU Quarterly Research Forum (QRF) will focus on understanding how increasing government access to the models and artificial intelligence algorithms used in system design might decrease the need for and expense of testing and increase confidence in results. Join on June 23, to learn more about digital engineering.

Dr. Laura Freeman, co-principal investigator and co-author of the AIRC report, “Digital Engineering Enhanced T&E Learning-Based Systems,” will present a summary of the study and explore the topic of Digital Engineering.

The latest developments in DAU Digital Acquisition and Digital Engineering (DE) courses, credentials, workshops and resources, such as DAU’s Digital Engineering for DoD Consumers credential, will be presented by Dr. James Roche, DAU Professor of Systems Engineering Management.

Participants will be able to engage in a question-and-answer session following these presentations. Members of the Defense Acquisition Workforce will receive a certificate of participation after completing the end-of-session activity to claim 1.5 continuous learning points (CLPs).

Speakers

Dr. Laura Freeman
Dr. Laura Freeman
Virginia Tech

Dr. Freeman is the deputy director of the Virginia Tech National Security Institute. Additionally, she is a research associate professor in the Department of Statistics and a faculty member of the Commonwealth Cyber Initiative. Her research interests include experimental design considerations in machine learning and artificial intelligence, cybersecurity analytics, reliability analysis and statistical engineering. Dr. Freeman holds memberships with the National Defense Industrial Association, the American Statistical Association and the International Test and Evaluation Association (ITEA) as the editor-in-chief of the ITEA Journal of Test and Evaluation. Dr. Freeman received her Ph.D. and M.S. in Statistics and B.S. in Aerospace Engineering all from Virginia Tech.

person-icon-3
Dr. James Roche
CNE DAU

Dr. Roche has a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Pennsylvania State University and an M.A. in National Security and Strategic Studies from the Naval War College. Over the past 30 years, Dr. Roche worked in academia, industry and the federal government. His work on fundamental and applied research as well as development and policy applications span Army, Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps systems (e.g., systems engineering and software development for the warfighter) and includes collaboration with managers, interdisciplinary scientists and engineers to accomplish projects at the intersection of engineering, science and technology and management. Currently, Dr. Roche is a Professor of Systems Engineering Management at DAU.

Optimizing Incentives for Acquisition Innovation and Agility

Events

Optimizing Incentives for Acquisition Innovation and Agility

June 28, 2023 & August 17, 2023

10:00 AM ET

The Acquisition Innovation Research Center (AIRC) and the George Mason University School of Business’ Greg and Camille Baroni Center for Government Contracting cordially invite you to participate in a two-part webinar series on Optimizing Incentives for Acquisition Innovation and Agility. Each discussion will be enriched by the research papers authored by AIRC. The panel for each session will include a paper author, a government representative, and an industry member.

Please visit the event website and explore the papers for complete information. Registration is free.

Attendees can earn one Continuous Learning Point (CLP) and one Professional Development Unit (PDU) for this webinar.

Sessions

Session 1: June 28, 2023, 10:00 AM ET

The first session, scheduled for June 28, will discuss Innovation for Digital Transformation and Policy Analytics.  This research effort evaluated the potential for an AIRC Policy Test Laboratory which would allow policy makers to test policies prior to execution. The panel will discuss the opportunities for such a policy test lab as well as the recommendations identified in the report.

The panelists for this session are Kristen Baldwin, Stephanie Halcrow, Ted Hanawalt, and William Rouse.

Session 2: August 17, 2023, 10:00 AM ET

The second session, scheduled for August 17, will focus on Incentives for Motivating Workforce Agility and Innovation. This report documents the pilot study conducted in partnership with the Air Force Installation Contracting Center and offers different approaches to motivating workforce agility and innovation.

The panelists for this session are Mike Rayo, Major General Alice Trevino (USAF), Denyce Carter, and Christopher Zember.

Speakers

Kristen Baldwin_sq_1
Ms. Kristen Baldwin
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Science, Technology and Engineering, Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force (Acquisition, Technology and Logistics)
Mike Rayo_sq_1
Dr. Mike Rayo
Associate Professor of Cognitive Systems Engineering, The Ohio State University
Denyce Carter_sq_1
Ms. Denyce Carter
President-elect, National Contract Management Association
Dr. William B. Rouse
Dr. William B. Rouse
Research Professor, McCourt School of Public Policy, Georgetown University
Ms. Stephanie Halcrow
Ms. Stephanie Halcrow
Senior Fellow, Baroni Center for Government Contracting
Alice Treviño_sq_1
Maj. Gen. Alice Treviño
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Contracting, US Air Force
Ted Hanawalt_sq_1
Dr. Ted Hanawalt
Director of Market Research, General Motors
Mr. Christopher Zember
Mr. Christopher Zember
AIRC Fellow, Stevens Institute of Technology

2023 Phase I Call for Research Proposals

2023 Phase I Call for Research Proposals

Digital Acquisition and Acquisition Integration and Interoperability (AI2)

Open call to all faculty, fellows, and research staff at SERC/AIRC universities for Phase I research proposals related to innovative ideas to improve the integration and interoperability of acquired defense systems. Funding awards for Phase I studies up to $75,000 are anticipated for the Fall 2023 Semester.

Research proposal responses are due by June 15, 2023, by 11:59 pm EDT.

Research Areas

Governing Cross-Organizational Integration and Interoperability Efforts. What governance structures can address distributed and de-centralized enterprise capabilities? Integrated, centralized enterprise capabilities?

Acquiring and Integrating Interoperable Capabilities Across Organizational Boundaries. What acquisition entity/structure can address enterprise capabilities?

Requirements Setting and Managing Requirements that Cut Across Organizations. What approaches could be introduced (e.g., increased direct combatant commander involvement)?

Budgeting and Financial Resources for Cross-Organizational Integration and Interoperability. What new budgeting approaches could be pursued (e.g., enterprise and portfolio budgets)?

Incentivizing Integration and Interoperability Across Organizations. What changes to incentives can drive progress in the four areas above?

Key Dates

Call for Research Proposals Open: May 11, 2023

Proposers Meeting: May 17, 2023

Watch of a recording of the ZoomGov meeting that includes answers to questions from researchers on how to submit a proposal.

Proposals Due: June 15, 2023, by 11:59 pm EDT   

Awards Announced: June – July 2023    

Submission Instructions

To apply for Phase I incubator funding, submit a short description of your proposed research concept, addressing the first six Heilmeier Catechism criteria used to “help Agency officials think through and evaluate proposed research programs,” namely:

• What are you trying to do? Articulate your objectives using absolutely no jargon.
• How is it done today, and what are the limits of current practice?
• What is new in your approach and why do you think it will be successful?
• Who cares? If you are successful, what difference will it make?
• What are the risks?
• How much will it cost (for Phase I)?

Proposals and all supporting material must be concise; proposals must be no longer than two (2) pages in length. An additional page can be included to contain endnote references, graphics, and URL links to faculty/researcher bios or CVs. Include the names of the research team, lead university, partner universities (if any), and research challenge area with the title of your proposed research task. Format should be text-extractable PDFs or Microsoft Word files.

The overall value of the submissions will be judged based on several criteria, including: intellectual merit, clarity of the vision, novelty, past performance of the investigators, the potential strategic impact on and importance for the DoD, and the degree of taking full advantage of academia’s multi-disciplinary research capabilities. For past performance, please include references to previous research reports and published papers. If there are other sponsors within the DoD who may be interested in your proposed research and might provide matching funds or project guidance, please include this information as well.

Research proposal responses are due by June 15, 2023, by 11:59 pm EDT.

Submit a Proposal

Read 2022 AIRC Incubator Reports

Agile Development of Hardware-Reliant Systems Workshop

Events

Agile Development of Hardware-Reliant Systems

April 18–19, 2023

Washington, DC

Challenge: Rapidly advancing threats and technologies have increased the need for the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) to develop, field, and upgrade operational capabilities to ensure mission effectiveness and success more quickly. Agile development along with DevSecOps (development, security, and operations) can accelerate acquisition and improve relevance. Industry has successfully applied Agile and DevSecOps to software, hardware, and inter-reliant hardware/software systems. The DoD has embarked on this journey—but primarily only for software systems. However, continuous innovation and deployment is a total system concern, and involves hardware components in a system as well as software, business process, funding, and all other human-oriented intangible components.

Background: Agile enterprises recognize that deploying new systems or capabilities cannot wait on the slowest components of the system. Instead, all components need to be deployed when ready, and both systems and organizations need to be structured to support modularity and flow. The DoD has struggled to make the shift to Agile. Over years of employing more sequential approaches, the Department, like other organizations, has created siloed organizations responsible for one part of the process with movement to a different stage (silo) triggered by full completion of the activity, coupled with large testing events at the end of development. Alternatively, the core principle behind Agile is “flow.” The flow of work should continue consistently across cycles of product strategy, resources, product development and test, and product support. With Digital Transformation, the DoD can reduce phase durations and cycle times in all phases of development and acquisition. By integrating Agile and DevSecOps initiatives, the DoD can improve flow, allowing components to react more quickly to changing end-user demands.

Workshop Focus: Agile practices for hardware-intensive systems in Digital Engineering and Digital Acquisition as a primary driver to agile product development, along with focused adaptations in acquisition practices and policy in support of agile transformation.

Format: A working discussion and sharing of applied academic, industry, and government best practices, lessons, DoD challenges, and progress.

Goals: Develop a set of foundational practices and research vectors relating to hardware-related Agile and DevSecOps and Digital Engineering/Acquisition to provide practical advice to programs in applying these techniques to both hardware and software elements of acquired systems while facilitating workforce training and improvement.

Who Should Attend? Individuals from across academia, industry, and government who are conducting applied research, policy making, process development, and execution of hardware-related agile development across all dimensions of DoD programs—acquisition, policy, engineering, and technology—with the objective of achieving agility at enterprise scale.